Search for: "State v. J. D. C."
Results 61 - 80
of 3,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
The text applies to those who hold "civil office under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Joshua D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
Governance agreements frequently have a statutory grounding in a section of the DGCL (for example, stockholder agreements are rooted in Section 218(c) and (d)). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
D. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
South Africa contends that Israel has commissioned acts capable of falling within Article II (a), (b), (c), and (d) of the Genocide Convention by “killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious bodily and mental harm, and inflicting upon them conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
(All adjudicators except Madam Justice Côté applied a reasonableness standard; Côté J. concurred in the result, but would have applied a correctness standard.) [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
But Judge J. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Robert C. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
[It was déjà vu, but this time post-Bruen.] [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
Restoration 1 by J&D, LLC (SD 7/12/2023) – No update this month. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
., State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
Gardner and Renée D. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am
D’Amico, 2019 SCC 23, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 394, at para. 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
Richard D. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
C. [read post]
