Search for: "State v. J. D. J." Results 61 - 80 of 6,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
D]espite arguing against the relevance of foreign judgments, the States themselves are now relying on the foreign judgments in [the] context of ‘direct and immediate effect test theory’. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
D]espite arguing against the relevance of foreign judgments, the States themselves are now relying on the foreign judgments in [the] context of ‘direct and immediate effect test theory’. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
The only European authority on "staple commercial products" cited was a Patents County Court decision in Pavel v Sony Corporation where HHJ Ford stated that a "staple commercial product is a commodity or raw material". [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 1:23 am
 Professor Howard similarly stated that the skilled person could have engineered a minigene construct including rearranged V, D and J segments. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]