Search for: "State v. J. Hill" Results 61 - 80 of 983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2011, 4:48 am by Chris Laughton
Like me (but he expresses it far more eloquently in Virtualpurple), Norris J prefers the decision of HHJ McCahill QC in Hill v Stokes Plc [2010] EWHC 3726. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
Reporting today on the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 22 April 2020 Nicol J heard an application in the case of Notting Hill Genesis v Ali. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Alford and Brooks Foland of the Camp Hill, PA office of Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:28 am
The statute specifically states "the" notice, not merely "notice. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Kehr, Fundamental Rights in the United States Court of Federal Claims, 35 Regent University Law Review 233-256 (2023).Ariel J. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
Hill delivered the decision.Link: [tinyurl.com] . [read post]