Search for: "State v. J. Woods" Results 61 - 80 of 552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Hyun Woo Kang
If more than one meaning is properly possible then the court is to engage in the iterative process of construction (Wood v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 17 – Copyright Substantial Similarity Crossprogrammed with my panel; I came here first because I had more experience with the first paper in the other panel. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm by Josh Blackman
By contrast, Justice Thomas's dissent cites opinions from Judges Sutton and Wood, without name-dropping: Huff v. [read post]