Search for: "State v. Janet"
Results 61 - 80
of 531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
Am. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:19 pm
Defiant in his Arizona v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:17 am
Supreme Court’s release of its decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Commodity Futures Trading Comm. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
It looks like USA v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:00 pm
State, an aggravated sexual assault out of Harris County:Apellant's opening - Janet, not Robert, MorrowState's response - Carol CameronAppellant's responseHere's a link to the underlying opinion. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit yesterday upheld its 2008 ruling that the Federal Communications Commission acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it fined CBS Corp. $550,000 for airing the 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime wardrobe malfunction that caused Justin Timberlake to bare Janet Jackson's breast for an entire nine-sixteenths of a second (see "TUOL" post 9/17/09).As reported by the Associated Press, the… [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 5:46 pm
After an incredibly busy week, I finally had time today to read carefully Judge Aileen Cannon's opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
"The case is Zherka v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
Why was (at least) the Janet Jackson song dropped? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:48 am
Lyttle v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:12 am
One of the latest contentious cases is that of Wyeth v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
George Christian, Janet Nocek, Barbara Bailey and Peter Chase — employees or officers of Library Connection, a consortium of libraries in Connecticut — were plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
George Christian, Janet Nocek, Barbara Bailey and Peter Chase — employees or officers of Library Connection, a consortium of libraries in Connecticut — were plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
