Search for: "State v. John D. Justice" Results 61 - 80 of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports that “[d]uring a one-hour interview on Wednesday in New Zealand, Chief Justice of the United States John G. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am by Suzanna Sherry
Maine (an earlier state sovereign immunity case) and District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:58 am by Jeff Gamso
  Were I also doing 1983 work, I'd be going after them as agents of the state, on behalf of their victims, for abusing the power the state gives them. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm by Ronald Mann
Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, returned to it when he opened questioning of Kanji, commenting: I’d like to return to Justice Alito’s question. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm by Jennifer Koh
§ 1326(d), was enacted by Congress after the court’s 1987 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
”  Dissent in South Dakota v Wayfair Chief Justice John Roberts authored a dissenting opinion in which Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan joined. [read post]
16 May 2009, 3:51 am
EEO/iNews from the United States Supreme Court - Thursday, May 14, 2009Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:56 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, “turned out to be one of those narrow decisions that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has touted as the way to achieve greater unanimity. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:05 am by SHG
Board of Education, on the constitutionality of racial segregation in state school systems; and a memorandum on a federal case, Bolling v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:15 am by David Markus
Two, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy, found that the formula for identifying states requiring federal oversight no longer was constitutional. [read post]