Search for: "State v. Jose R."
Results 61 - 80
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
“Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Jose Borges moved, pursuant to CPLR 5225 and 5240, to compel assignment of Defendant/Judgment Debtor Alfred Placeres’s potential legal malpractice claim against Defendant’s friend and former attorney to satisfy Plaintiff’s judgment (motion sequence 023). [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
“Necessity” is the mother of discretion.United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 7:23 am
Judge Schroeder dissented (McCray v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
In оthеr wоrdѕ, federal and state gоvеrnmеntѕ may рlасе tаx liens fоr unраіd іnсоmе tаxеѕ, whіlе lосаl gоvеrnmеntѕ mау рlасе tаx lіеnѕ fоr unраіd… [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
More likely the state will do what elites do everywhere--they ignore these engagements and to the extent possible undermine their authors. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Hosp. v State, 674 SW2d 828, 830 [Tex App 1984]). [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:59 am
R. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Table 1: Sales Tax Treatment of Food is Haphazard in State Tax Codes Unequal Treatment of Groceries, Candy, and Soda in State Tax Codes as of January 1, 2018 State State General Sales Tax Grocery Treatment Candy Treated the Same as Groceries? [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
R. 10(c)). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
City of San Jose, 136 S. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
“By way of relevant background, in 2011, Jose A. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
R. 10(c)). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm
Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo V. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am
See Dawson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
Judgment was reserved On 27 June 2017 Warby J handed down judgment in the cases of Alsaifi v Amunwa and Alsaifi v Trinity Mirror [2017] EWHC 1444 (QB) and Alsaifi v Amunwa [2017] EWHC 1443 (QB) As we have already mentioned, on 29 and 30 June 2017 the Administrative Court (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J) heard the judicial review application in the case of R (News Media Association) v Press Recognition Panel. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
In Arias v. [read post]
