Search for: "State v. Jost"
Results 61 - 80
of 276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
First up is Currier v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am
A Daily Journal podcast features discussion with Peter Altman about Lucia v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
’” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost weighs in on last week’s oral argument in on Ayestas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
At Just Security, William Dodge discusses last week’s oral argument in Jesner v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:07 am
In August, a federal panel of judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted the 18 states standing to contest the non-payments in a case called House v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
Additional commentary on the argument comes from Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice, arguing that “[j]udges cannot shirk hard issues because they are hard. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
Morris, and NLRB v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost observes that “the administration is set to open the Supreme Court’s new term next month … by siding with business interests and against organized labor in a case testing employees’ ability to join with other workers in contesting workplace policies that violate state or federal law,” “after revers[ing] the position previously taken by the Obama administration. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:29 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost notes that “the administration is set to open the Supreme Court’s new term next month [in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost weighs in on Packingham v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:15 am
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost observes that the “question now is whether the surprisingly easy case will make bad law by limiting the power of states to enforce constitutional provisions prohibiting government assistance to private schools, whether secular or sectarian. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost argues that with its decision last week in Ziglar v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost argues that although “the reviews are mostly good,” “[o]n close examination, the opinion is structurally flawed, legally simplistic, and unfortunate on policy grounds. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:36 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:46 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule in a 1984 Washington, D.C., murder case, and Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
