Search for: "State v. Kelly " Results 61 - 80 of 1,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
Kelly (07-1223), involving a split in lower courts on the degree of deference that federal habeas courts must give to a state court finding. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 4:08 am by SHG
  The question arose from a discussion that he and Connecticut public defender Gideon had about an awful decision, State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:08 am by WIMS
  A "Whirlwind of Confusion": Sixth Circuit Imposes Nationwide Stay of EPA's New Clean Water Rule - Analysis from Jackson Kelly PLLC State of Ohio v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th states that Concepcion v US, 142 S. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 21 NY3d 324, 334 [2013], quoting AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:40 am by Matthew Nelson
 ;  Chief Justice Kelly and Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway dissented. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
Wisotsky v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York Petitioner Daniel Wisotsky filed an Article 78 Petition in order to have the court annul the November 26, 2008 decision of Respondent Raymond Kelly, Commissioner of the New York Police Department to deny Petitioner the insurance of a premises residence pistol license. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:00 am by EEM
News:Some commentary on and analysis of oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 12:39 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Kelly: belmont-v-kelly-etc-brief-re-state-of-nooksack-tribal-judiciary-and-emergency-motion-for-misc-relief And here is an order from the Nooksack Supreme Court (holdover council) in In re Orders Entered by Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals: in-re-orders-entered-by-nooksack-tribal-court-of-appeals-mandate-and-order-vacating-tribal-court-of-appeals-orders-as-void   [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]