Search for: "State v. Kohl" Results 61 - 80 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Case C-484/14 McFadden is a reference for a preliminary ruling from CJEU-loving Member State Germany, seeking clarification as regards the liability of a freely-accessible wi-fi provider for third-party copyright infringements committed via that wireless network. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:27 pm
Although state law governs the interpretationof contracts generally, see Thatcher v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
  While the states were fee to appropriate property using their own court systems, the power of the federal government to use its own courts to take property located in the states was not recognized until 1875 (Kohl v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
—————– Violators would forfeit their 180-day exclusivity period: Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(V)) is amended by inserting `section 29 of the Clayton Act or’ after `that the agreement has violated’. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
"Congress has used that sentence to enact every kind of legislation under the sun, at least until the Rehnquist Court came along.In US v Lopez, the Court looked at the constitutionality of the Gun-Free School Zones Act, which was authored by my home state senator and favorite Keebler elf, Herb Kohl. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
Abuse & Neglect: NEGLECT FINDING REQUIRES PROOF OF MENTAL STATE, DELAWARE SUPREME COURT FINDS, Dep't of Health & Social Servs. v. [read post]