Search for: "State v. Kraft General Foods, Inc." Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Jiffy Lube Chick-fil-A Family Dollar Jimmy Johns Chili’s Firestone Auto Care Kelly Moore Paints Chipotle Flying J KFC Chrysler Food Services of America Kohl’s Kraft Foods Philip Morris Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:13 am
Kraft General Foods, Inc., 62 F.3d 368 (11th Cir. 1995), a class of plaintiffs challenged the release used in connection with a plant closing, arguing that the employer should have provided information – i.e., ages and job titles – of individuals employed at other plants if the company "considered for closure several plants producing similar products" and if "employees at other plants may assume some of the functions of the closed plant. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Kraft Foods Global, Inc., Case No. 09-2691, addressed the question of whether Section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), which allows a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) to exclude time spent changing into and out of work clothes (“donning and doffing”) from hours worked, pre-empts a state law that lacks an equivalent exception.Massachusetts - New Massachusetts law overhauls employer access to criminal… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm by Rick Hasen
Kraft Foods Global, Inc., 653 F.3d 582, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (“Direct evidence is something close to an explicit admission . . . that a particular decision was motivated by discrimination; this type of evidence is rare, but it ‘uniquely reveals’ the . . . intent to discriminate. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
That year, she also successfully defended against a claim of trademark infringement for her client, PGD, Inc., involving the name of a generic drug in the case Doral Pharmamedics v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
 As this piece was being written, a “new arrival” is Kraft Foods Global, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
  Outside of this directive, the agencies generally have taken the view that prior enforcement of the antitrust laws was too lax and that the narrow focus on more traditional antitrust harms (such as higher prices, reduced output, or lower quality) has been too narrow. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Generous public pensions, meanwhile, are beginning to catch up with the state, particularly as the population declines. [read post]