Search for: "State v. Kraft General Foods, Inc." Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
Kraft Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1537 (11th Cir. 1986); Computer Care v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:26 am
Kraft Foods Global, Inc., 549 F.3d 842, 848 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(China Law Blog) China plans for 50% increase in number of patent agents (IAM) IP rights and Chinese producers: you live and die by the jump shot (IP finance) Copyright Administrative Punishment Implementation Rules (2009) (IP Dragon) Denmark Court finds no infringement in wine bottle battle: Udesen Danmark v Excellent Wine Danmark A/S (International Law Office) Europe ECJ rules on bad faith in chocolate bunnies case: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(China Law Blog) China plans for 50% increase in number of patent agents (IAM) IP rights and Chinese producers: you live and die by the jump shot (IP finance) Copyright Administrative Punishment Implementation Rules (2009) (IP Dragon)   Denmark Court finds no infringement in wine bottle battle: Udesen Danmark v Excellent Wine Danmark A/S (International Law Office)   Europe ECJ rules on bad faith in chocolate bunnies case: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli (IPKat)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(China Law Blog) Poisonous Optima dog food: product liability or blame the counterfeiters? [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Canadian Trademark Blog) CIPO to open public consultation period regarding proposed changes to section 45 proceedings (Canadian Trademark Blog) Kraft and Euro-Excellence settle copyright case concerning parallel importation of chocolate bars (Excess Copyright) Toronto Star investigates textbook copying (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) CBC on public domain (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Art Gallery of Ontario photography policy faces criticism over restriction based on misleading… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:06 pm
One news report noted: “U.S. foodmaker Kraft Foods Inc. has used the name Parmesan for grated hard cheese since the mid-1940s, according to its Web site. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:13 am
Kraft General Foods, Inc., 62 F.3d 368 (11th Cir. 1995), a class of plaintiffs challenged the release used in connection with a plant closing, arguing that the employer should have provided information – i.e., ages and job titles – of individuals employed at other plants if the company "considered for closure several plants producing similar products" and if "employees at other plants may assume some of the functions of the closed plant. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:08 pm
YouTube, Inc., No. 07-CV-2103 (S.D.N.Y. filed March 13, 2007); Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]