Search for: "State v. Leader" Results 61 - 80 of 6,982
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Emphasis on Individual Accountability to Protect the Markets To encourage a compliance culture, Associate Director Stacy Bogert stated that the SEC will seek clawbacks of executive compensation under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 304. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” As he kept saying, “It is difficult to see how the state can forbid, as contrary to public morality, a practice that numerous religious leaders approve as morally right. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm by michael
  Red Lobster has tried to navigate post-pandemic difficulties with a variety of methods and leaders. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Nicholas Noe
The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
Yulia said that during the search the police officers verbally accused her of being a “lesbian, sex trainer, and propagandist leader. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
  The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh
The article is here; the Introduction: As articulated by Justice Brandeis in Whitney v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
   How one state's 2008 law has effectively curbed how face recognition technology is used there, perhaps creating a model for other states or Congress to follow. [read post]