Search for: "State v. Leathers" Results 61 - 80 of 306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
The case is Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants are not professionals as required for a claim for professional malpractice (see Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20, 28 [2001]; Starr v Fuoco Group LLP, 137 AD3d 634, 634 [1st Dept 2016]; Leather v United States Trust Co. of N. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
Conference on RPM - On December 4, a conference was held in Washington, D.C. on the topic of resale price maintenance ("RPM") by consumer advocates, regulators, and policy experts opposed to RPM.Minimum RPM has emerged as a hot topic in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2007 ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:25 pm by Larry
That means that the decision of the full United States Court of Appeals in Trek Leather stands as the law of the land. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm by Marina Chafa
Australian Leather was unable to show that “ugg” is, or ever has been, generic among footwear consumers in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Supreme Court issued one of its most noteworthy antitrust decisions in decades in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:41 am by Kevin
Black in Color Leather Vest With Attached Outlaws Motorcycle Club Patches, No. 2-15-0495 (Ill. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am by Christine Nielsen
Under federal law, minimum resale price maintenance has been considered lawful if reasonable under the circumstances since the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
This contract stated that the bag business sold by Baquet included the Benelux word mark NATHAN, which he had had registered in 1991 for leather items, clothing and shoes in Classes 18 and 25. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 1:41 pm by Eric Goldman
YouTube Schedule A Defendants A Judge Enumerates a SAD Scheme Plaintiff’s Multiple Abuses, But Still Won’t Award Sanctions–Jiangsu Huari Webbing Leather v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
 This was one of the most fought over issues in the Louboutin v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
Although this action was brought after the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 8:11 am by David Strifling
That position will be tested again should the court accept the pending petition for review in Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, Inc. and Leather Rich, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 7:04 am by Eric Goldman
YouTube Schedule A Defendants A Judge Enumerates a SAD Scheme Plaintiff’s Multiple Abuses, But Still Won’t Award Sanctions–Jiangsu Huari Webbing Leather v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm by Toby Heytens
Holder), and overruled earlier decisions involving antitrust (Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]