Search for: "State v. Macomber" Results 61 - 80 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2016, 3:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Vigilance from the bench relative to the collection of fines is one thing; but incarceration of a defendant that lacks any ability to pay constitutes a debtor's prison.Incarceration for the inability to pay fines and costs was proscribed by the United States Supreme Court in the 1983 case of Bearden v Georgia. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> El Comite el Bienestar de Earlimart v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
“Plaintiff [Jahmel Binion] is an individual who resides in Macomb County, Michigan. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
[Binion] is an individual who resides in Macomb County, Michigan. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:42 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
While Michigan is generally a very creditor friendly state, recently we have had some favorable decisions for debtors. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:50 am by Steven Gursten
These include: In 2008, Tom helped obtain a $5.6 million dollar verdict for a Macomb County man run over by a pickup truck in Broeren v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:09 am
However, the appeals court said that McCleese can seek that the charges against him be dismissed based on the decision in People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:53 am by admin
In November of 2012, Kevin Seiferheld and Joshua Terebelo received a $1.5 million jury verdict on a State Farm $0 offer in Macomb County for a “low vehicle damage” car accident. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:54 am by Nicole Mazzocco
    The Dart Properties panel stated that venue should have been proper in Macomb County under MCL 600.1641(2). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:14 pm by Julie Lam
The Michigan Supreme Court granted the application for leave to appeal in State of Michigan v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm by Julie Lam
Moore, No. 143725, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and remanded the case to the Macomb Circuit Court for resentencing. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The controlled substances involved included the Schedule II drug OxyContin, the Schedule III drug Vicodin, the Schedule IV drug Xanax, and the Schedule V drug cough syrup with codeine. [read post]