Search for: "State v. Maguire"
Results 61 - 80
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 7:17 am
Osborn, 260 So. 3d 527 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), quoting Maguire v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:17 am
Osborn, 260 So. 3d 527 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), quoting Maguire v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 5 Dec 2017. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:17 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
Maguire 16 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
’ The CJEU did agree and has agreed ever since.Yet, the impact of CJEU case law, even after more and consistent CJEU case law tackling the concept of originality, has not always been understood correctly by UK courts, with some judgments suggesting that ‘author’s own intellectual creation’ is an alternative phrase for ‘sufficient skill, labour or effort’ (Temple Island, para 27; Taylor v Maguire, para 8).More recent judgments support however the… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
United States Issue: Whether the holding in Roe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
Since that kind of opinion testimony is prohibited under the rules of evidence, the Village gets a new trial.The case is Village of Freeport v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
Maguire, A-110 January 12,2016, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed just such an issue. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:03 pm
Merck v Merck: what you think ... so far. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:34 am
Nat’l des Appellations D’Origine v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/YkUQ3jeQmE -> 16 Artists That Are Now Speaking Out Against Streaming http://t.co/qvQ8uiG6rN -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-12-05: Copyright in papercuts Taylor v Maguire [2013] EWHC 3804 (IP… http://t.co/QOJ1AUgxEO -> Tired of unsolicited spam? [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 26th October 2022. [read post]
