Search for: "State v. Mahoney"
Results 61 - 80
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 3:12 am
Co. v Zeff Design, 60 AD3d 453, 455 [2009]). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:16 pm
Justice Mahoney stated at paragraph 33: “OW, in her discussions with E, indicates that she was aware of the link between the alleged sexual assaults and problems in her life. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am
’ Mahoney v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:36 pm
Mahoney, 608 F.Supp.2d 526, 546-47 (S.D.N.Y.2009) (allegations that “plaintiffs Moraes and Nichols worked an average of fifty and sixty-five hours per week, respectively, yet were never paid overtime for the extra hours that they worked” stated FLSA overtime claim); see also Connelly v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:53 pm
- Dallas lawyer Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog Black Firefighters Move to Intervene in Ricci v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
West, 92 AD2d 620,622 (1983)62 NY2d 708 (1984), (Mahoney, P.J. dissenting) revd on dissenting opinion below. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:31 am
It is well settled that "[a] subrogee acquires all rights, defenses and remedies of the subrogor and is subject to any claims or defenses which may be raised against the subrogor" (Servidori v Mahoney, 129 AD2d 944, 945 [1987]; see United States Fid. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
And in Mahoney v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
Mahoney of Latham & Watkins, LLP will argue the case for the petitioner. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 6:44 am
Edo and Safeco v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 2:50 am
In 2009, a 6-3 SCOTUS majority held, in Holder v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:13 pm
Div. 1995) (holding a duty to support is terminated at emancipation, obviating any judicial obligation to enforce payment); Mahoney v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:09 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:09 am
In State v. [read post]
