Search for: "State v. Marcotte"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm
” The procedural changes to NLRB election procedures implemented by the quickie election rule place employers at a significant disadvantage when faced with a union demand for an election, Incorporating most of the procedures contained in a 2011 NLRB proposal previously invalidated by the District of Columbia’s district court in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
Burwell Supreme Court Oral Argument Read Transcript of King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:19 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
©2015 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
Plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:29 am
., Pfeil v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
That order, in turn, began with recitals stating that the hearing occurred in November 2011 and that the mother appeared. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:57 am
See Aubin v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am
©2014 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United… [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
In his May 9, 2014 order in Wright v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
As this site explains, the state of Maryland “recognizes two kinds of divorce: limited and absolute. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense of… [read post]
