Search for: "State v. Marino" Results 61 - 80 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | Litigation-Proof Patents: Avoiding the Most Common Patent Mistakes and Patent Portfolios: Quality, Creation, and Cost reviewed | Italy and San Marino’s friendship on IP is over| Problems and imperfections in biotech patenting: realities on the ground and trying to fix the system.Never too late 31 [week ending Sunday 1 February] -- Women in IP, a MIP’s perspective | Another linking reference to the CJEU | Catarina Holtz on… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:27 am
Marino SUFFOLK COUNTYReal Property Defendant Waives Standing Defense by Failing To Assert Same in Answer or Pre-Answer Motion Washington Mutual Bank NA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | Litigation-Proof Patents: Avoiding the Most Common Patent Mistakes and Patent Portfolios: Quality, Creation, and Cost reviewed | Italy and San Marino’s friendship on IP is over| Problems and imperfections in biotech patenting: realities on the ground and trying to fix the system. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm by CAPTAIN
  State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle just got some uncomforting news. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
 A more traditional form of book is Laure Marino's Droit de la Propriété Industrielle, the details of which you can retrieve from her website here. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
The IPKats are grateful to their talented friend Grégoire Marino for this link to a trailer for a film -- not yet released -- entitled "The Invention of Dr Nakamats". [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm by CAPTAIN
  And second, remember that there is a large segment of the membership of the DCBA that has never seen the inside of a State courtroom. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
Clark, 335 U.S. 188 (1948) Marino v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]