Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 61 - 80
of 19,767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2007, 1:27 am
SC07-1603 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
The IPKat has been informed that a third case is still proceeding at first instance.The Mark 1 decision was about dosage regimes and a composition with specified antibody purity, and the Mark 2 decision about formulations (including the fascinating issue of the construction of product-by-process claims).Now, hot of the press, the IPKat has got his paws on the appeal decision Hospira (UK) Ltd v Genentech, Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 57 (06 February 2015), posted on BAILII as… [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
The magistrate judge recommended denying defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
This in particular since “the public retains only an imperfect memory of the marks registered in the Member States or of Community marks ... [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
[www.markschwab.us][www.markschwab.us]ny-821133 No. 08-13435-P _____________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________________________ MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
’ State Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:16 am
As readers have no doubt not forgotten, an eight Justice Court is weighing the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:50 pm
Coach Carroll has put Sanchez off limits to the press, stating, “I know how excited he is. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
This filing is in response to the SEC’s Law in Opposition to Mark Cuban’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 11:30 am
Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli (Ropes & Gray) address The Sherman Act's Extra-Territorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised by United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
” Chiarella v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:25 pm
In State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:26 am
" ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:20 am
It was not controlled by state law. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am
Download this Insight (PDF) Access the code and data (GitHub repository) Introduction The majority decision in Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:22 am
" United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
The position of the EUIPO, when it comes to acquired distinctiveness through use in the UK for the purposes of an invalidation action against a registered EU trade mark (EUTM), is that the distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK is not relevant for EU trade mark applications filed after the end of the transition period (December 31st, 2020).However, the now said has not always been entirely clear, since case law (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488),… [read post]
