Search for: "State v. Mark A. Humphrey"
Results 61 - 80
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2018, 12:26 am
Scrutinizer GmbH, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, No. 18-1195, 13 September 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am
This time, the discussion focused on whether a non-traditional EU trade mark that is not inherently distinctive must be shown to have acquired distinctiveness in the EU as a whole, or in every single Member State. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
This time, the discussion focused on whether a non-traditional EU trade mark that is not inherently distinctive must be shown to have acquired distinctiveness in the EU as a whole, or in every single Member State. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 11:45 pm
Nicholas KasterThe Trademark Trial and Appeal Board did not err when it found that the WU DANG TAI CHI GREEN TEA mark was confusingly similar to the registered mark TAI CHI, according to the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:16 am
These principles were all recently explored again in the CJEU case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb v Lohmann & Rauscher International Case C-642/16. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:32 am
However, already in Boehringer Ingelheim v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 12:29 am
In 2006 the Danish Commercial Court (“The Court”) made another decision regarding the shape of snack products (decision no V-116-04). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
Oregon Brewing Company, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, No. 16-3602, 27 July 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:16 am
Cosmetic Warriors Ltd., United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 17-55325, 29 June 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
These are all matters for member states’ national laws. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
Art. 8(5) EUTMR, whereby the owner of a mark with a reputation can prevent the registration of a mark the use of which would take unfair advantage of the reputation, states that such use must be “without due cause”. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:30 pm
§1927 (Ketab Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:17 am
Easy Sanitary Solutions v Group Nivelles, C-361/15, on the irrelevance of the sector of use to determine novelty and individual character), but also 3d marks (cf. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:24 pm
Casey Road Food and Beverage, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-13043, 13 March 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:26 am
In the decision by DKBoA the DKBoA more or less repeated the arguments put forward by the DKPTO and referred to case C-487/07, L’Oréal v. [read post]
