Search for: "State v. Mark T."
Results 61 - 80
of 11,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
In particular, he took notice of footnote number 2, which states as follow: "Rosetta Stone conducted a brand equity study in February 2009 showing a substantial gap in actual recognition of the Rosetta Stone mark and the closest competing brand. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am
The Trade Mark Directive deals with exhaustion of the rights of the trade mark owner at Article 7, however it doesn’t precisely apply in this case as it relates to the use of a trade mark where goods have been put on the market in the EU under that mark. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
"[T]he government claims the Court erroneously relied upon the sufficient control analysis utilized in Morrison v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
Evid. 801(c) and 803; Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 am
In October 2021, the General Court (GC) issued the ruling in T-254/20, Roshen v EUIPO, which drew the attention of this Ukrainian Kat.Louis-Michel enjoys researching Soviet brandsThe dispute arose when “Krasny Oktyabr”, a Russian confectionary company, registered an EU trade mark (EUTM) in Class 30 for a figurative sign representing a lobster. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 17 (2005), quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm
Just answerin’—and in only two words: Presidential Immunity (see Nixon v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:29 am
Arnold J kicks off CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick After five days in court and 358 paragraphs, Mr Justice Arnold has just handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:46 am
I don’t know). [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
According to case law, that fact alone is, in principle, liable to create both a strong visual and phonetic similarity between the marks at issue (For Tune v EUIPO (T‑815/16)).Secondly, although, as the applicant had claimed, the relevant public normally attaches greater importance to the first part of words, this does not apply in all cases, nor does it call into question the principle that the examination of the similarity of trade marks must take into… [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
See Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:59 am
[T]he owner of the foreign mark is prevented from effectively expanding its business to the domestic jurisdiction under its own mark. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
AT&T v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
