Search for: "State v. Markey" Results 61 - 80 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 4:21 pm by Josephine Liu
  As we blogged about here, the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  All these questions are raised and answered in Mangione v Jacobs   2012 NY Slip Op 22211   Decided on July 31, 2012   Supreme Court, Queens County   Markey, J. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 9:38 pm by Glenn
Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Joe Barton (R-Texas) want information on Facebook courting kids http://t.co/JNXEnPLe 17:30:06, 2012-07-16 U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Although Justice Dollinger mentioned and found no conflict with the decisions of Queens County Justice Markey in Granger v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zpfcer (Elkan Abramowitz, Barry Bohrer) Reports and Resources Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal and Private Sector (PDF) 1.usa.gov/yzxOby (Homeland Security) comScore Releases February 2012 U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:03 am by Simon Lester
Markey’s bill addresses head-on the claims by Keystone supporters, who have asserted that the project is in the national security interests of the United States, and will reduce U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Ed Markey (D-Mass.) on nuclear disaster preparedness legislation. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
 Going further, the Court announced its intention to appoint its own damages experts to testify at trial, stating:   Judge Alsup relied on the authority of Monolithic Power Sys. v. [read post]