Search for: "State v. Marques"
Results 61 - 80
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
LandauVan Cleer & Arpels v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
Anyway, since MARQUES has looked after its feline followers so well, they are more than happy to do MARQUES a favour in return. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant… [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 3:38 am
Shades of McDermott v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:44 am
The IPKat thanks his Class 99 blog team colleague and great MARQUES supporter David Stone (Simmons & Simmons) for drawing his attention to it. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:50 am
The Commerce Clause question seems no more relevant than whether Obamacare is a valid use of Letters of Marque and Reprisal. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
"Disclosing business secrets to share purchasers" is an IP Draughts post by the ever-perceptive Mark Anderson, it being a review of the recent ruling in Richmond Pharmacology Limited v Chester Overseas Limited and others [2014] EWHC 2692 (Ch) noted by the IPKat here. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:48 pm
There are no cases in which someone petitions the Supreme Court for a ruling on whether states should get three senators. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
Ralston Purina Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
Coming up for consideration by the Court of Justice of the European Union is Case C-179/15 Daimler, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:02 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Dennis v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
Fourthly, in assessing the distinctive character of the mark in question the General Court distorted the relevant facts and did not sufficiently state the reasons for its judgment. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
