Search for: "State v. Mason" Results 61 - 80 of 1,285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Michael S. Knoll
And the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
  United States On 13 June 2023, the Texas Governor signed HB4 to make Texas the tenth state to have a comprehensive privacy law. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Pennsylvanians, New Yorkers, and New Englanders were no strangers to the constitutional technology Fritz calls ‘interposition,’ and he narrates in meticulous detail the many occasions on which states above the Mason-Dixon line participated in challenges to federal laws. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This very short essay summarizes the background of the Second Amendment and the subsequent judicial interpretations up through the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Not according to a recent case out of North Carolina, Mason v Mason 2022 NCBC 24 (May 13, 2022). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Mason at the ready (“what Mason touches he vulgarizes”) and then closing it deeply impressed how subtly and seriously Mark explained the justices’ decisionmaking. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
  According to that opinion, none of the three final states’ ratifications could count towards Article V’s ¾ requirement. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
  According to that opinion, none of the three final states’ ratifications could count towards Article V’s ¾ requirement. [read post]