Search for: "State v. McDonnell" Results 61 - 80 of 639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
That section prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee for sharing information he “has reasonable cause to believe . . . discloses a violation of state or federal statute” or of “a local, state, or federal rule or regulation” with a government agency, with a person with authority over the employee, or with another employee who has authority to investigate or correct all the violations. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:06 pm
An official act, pursuant to McDonnell v. [read post]
In 2003, California lawmakers enacted Labor Code Section 1102.6, setting forth a framework for whistleblower retaliation claims that varied from the burden-shifting test established by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by Elyssa Sternberg
The United States Supreme Court established a framework for evaluating discrimination claims based on circumstantial evidence in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
The term is connected to a number of other similar terms that seek to give meaning to the same set of practices or states of social being: for example, the German-English Weltanschauung) or perhaps “lifeworlds. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review this case may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Carrie McConnell of the Harrisburg, PA office of Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Rauch, P.C. for bringing this Maloney case to my attention.Oathout v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:52 am by Arturo Jara
The “V” initially stands out, but upon second glance, the “M” is revealed. [read post]