Search for: "State v. Meiers"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Fla. 2002) (quoting State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:31 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am
Back at the end of 2009 we reported the Supreme Court case of Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Meier and another, which upheld the use of a quia timet injunction – a prospective possession order – against a group of new travellers, preventing them from occupying any land owned by the Forestry Commission in the area. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 10:45 am
Meier and Lucas E. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:51 am
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm
" The organization of this article is as follows: Part I provides a brief history of pleading theory within the United States and a reexamination of the Conley v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:00 am
Meier (1st Dept. 2001) - $1,100,000 for 62 year old crime victim attacked and bound sustaining PTSD and exacerbation of old back injury Baba-Ali v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Barry Meier of the New York Times and Kris Maher of the Wall Street Journal report on the most recent developments in the case underlying Caperton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:17 am
The New York Times (10/12, Meier) reports, "The safety of vaccines is at the heart of a case expected to be heard on Tuesday by the United States Supreme Court, one that could have implications for hundreds of lawsuits that contend there is a link between vaccines and autism. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:14 am
The New York Times (10/12, Meier) reports, “The safety of vaccines is at the heart of a case expected to be heard on Tuesday by the United States Supreme Court, one that could have implications for hundreds of lawsuits that contend there is a link between vaccines and autism. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Meier v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:45 am
Meier and Lucas E. [read post]
