Search for: "State v. Merchandise Seized"
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Ashley: Costco v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:53 pm
Attorney Richard Callahan's office seeks to resurrect the case of United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:30 pm
In this case, the merchandise involved in the Section 545 offenses are classified as 'antiques,' and under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, Heading 9706, they are duty free. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 7:53 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
GPX International Tire Corporation et. al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
Before DLW could move the merchandise, the police seized the stash. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
For purposes of determining whether an Internet site conducts business directed to residents of the United States under subparagraph (A)(ii), the Commission may consider, among other indicators, whether (i) the Internet site is providing goods or services to users located in the United States; (ii) there is evidence that the Internet site is not intended to provide goods and services to such users or access to or delivery of goods and services to such users; (iii) the Internet site… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:01 pm
The case is captioned and docketed as United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm
The agent also stated that lying about the country of origin on customs documents constitutes a material false statement in violation of the federal criminal code, citing United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
(TorrentFreak) Global – Trade Marks & Domain Names No, ICE didn’t seize your domain; you’ve just been punked (ArsTechnica) ICANN development 2: Are you up for [.anything]? [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:00 am
On October 18, 2007, the justice court heard arguments regarding whether the seized equipment should be returned to the Moores following the State's dismissal of the criminal charges. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:44 pm
* Kim v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
Vice President of Bing, Harry Shum, stated that"We do not copy Google's search results. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
The regular and lawful transporting as merchandise; or 3. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat) United States US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’ patents (Prior… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
And the GAO notes: Historically, some types of mail were designed to channel broad public goals, such as furthering the dissemination of information, the distribution of merchandise, and the advancement of nonprofit organizations. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:23 am
" Henderson v. [read post]
