Search for: "State v. Murphy"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2006, 8:46 am
United States, 460 F.3d 79 (D.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:59 am
According to Murphy and Hradsky, the robbers stole from them a home theatre system, their cash, wallets, and ... [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 12:00 am
The taxpayer has filed its response to the Government's petition for rehearing en banc in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 3:00 am
Germain (Syracuse) has posted Taxing Emotional Injury Recoveries: A Critical Analysis of Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:17 am
(Link to Cases): For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (2): John Murphy v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:52 pm
: I had been waiting with bated breath for the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:19 am
Murphy, Jr.Appellant was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Cecil County of two felonious violations of the Maryland Controlled Dangerous Substances Act and of the False Statement to a Law Enforcement Officer offense proscribed by Md. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:38 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 2:09 am
See, North Carolina v. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 3:05 am
Circuit has entered an order granting the taxpayer's motion for an extension of time (to October 31) to respond to the Government's petition for rehearing en banc in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 11:56 pm
Back in April, when the Supreme Court denied certiorari for Murphy v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
Murphy v Callinan, like Collins before it, concerned an insurance policy. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:00 pm
The Supreme Court has denied a petition to modify the opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 11:30 am
The taxpayer and the Government have filed briefs on the application of Murphy v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:07 am
In the product liability lawsuit of Joseph Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:08 pm
Reversing the determination that a New Jersey law repealing prohibitions on sports gambling violated the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, making it unlawful for a State or its subdivisions to sponsor, operate, advertise, promote, license, or authorize betting on sports because by permitting sports betting the State was authorizing sports betting under the statute as PASPA was held to violate the anticommandeering rule stating that Congress cannot… [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:08 pm
” The Supreme Court subsequently issued an opinion reaffirming Murphy’s Tenth Circuit victory “for the reasons stated in McGirt v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
” Dissent in United States v Ballard Chief Justice Harlan Stone authored a dissent, which was joined by Justices Black, Reed,Murphy, and Rutledge. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:33 pm
ACCA has released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
