Search for: "State v. Music" Results 61 - 80 of 4,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright IPKat has an article examining the copyright issues raised in the Kate Middleton Mother’s Day royal photograph saga. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:55 am by James Kachmar
”  The author plaintiffs argued that “because defendants directly copied the copyrighted books to train the language models,” they did not need to show a substantial similarity between the works, relying on the 2012 Ninth Circuit case Range Road Music, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Sadly, the Supreme Court majority elided those difficulties in Brnovich v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 8:43 am by Nedim Malovic
The theme of the lecture is ‘Music Copyright: The Text and Data Mining Exceptions and the EU's AI Act’. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am by Jon Hyman
We're doing DEI wrong — via Business Insider Can states legally ban "woke" training in the workplace? [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2024, The Rt Hon Lucy Frazer MP, the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, and The Rt Hon James Cleverly MP, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, published their decision to vary a Restriction Order from the Leveson Inquiry to allow the use of the ledger cards for the purpose of the ongoing misuse of private information claim brought by seven claimants against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm by Amy Howe
In November, the justices heard United States v. [read post]