Search for: "State v. N. A. M." Results 61 - 80 of 4,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
& Pol'y Rev. 53, 66 & n.49, 98 & n.207 (1999); see also Timothy Farrar, Manual of the Constitution of the United States of America 436 (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 3d ed. rev. 1872) ("The general power of impeachment and trial may extend to others besides civil officers, as military or naval officers, or even persons not in office, and to other offences than those expressly requiring a judgment of removal from office . . . . [read post]
Today, I’m sounding the alarm once again: Military operations in Rafah could lead to a slaughter in Gaza. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The disclosures are modeled on certain line-item requirements found in Regulation M-A but tailored to address issues more specific to de-SPAC transactions. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  This limitation is based upon what Justice Barrett referred to as a broader “principle of structural preemption,” reflected in the Court’s holdings in landmark decisions such as Tarble’s Case (1871) (a state judge may not issue a writ of habeas corpus for the discharge of a person held by a federal official) and M'Clung v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
"[I]n Gorsuch's words, he would be required to undermine the very notion of income taxation 'if I'm not willing to overturn a hundred years' worth of precedent.' Right. [read post]