Search for: "State v. Noe" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Q2 2018 Quick Links, Part 5 (Potpourri)
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
Gibson v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
6th Cir. Decisions for Week of Mar. 17-21, 2008 (2 Pub. Ky decisions; 3 NPO)
23 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
Burns    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0115p.062008/03/19 Noe v. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Cases - http://www.sixthcircuitcases.com/
Fourth District Addresses Numerous Significant CEQA Issues In Action Challenging City of San Diego’s Utility Undergrounding Projects
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  McCann v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2020: A Look Back at the Year’s CEQA Case Law
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The case is Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Thursday Thinkpiece: Mason on Digital Signatures
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ltd. v. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca
2010 MID-YEAR CEQA UPDATE
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Tomlinson v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Work Done Under Unchallenged CEQA Emergency Exemption Held Part Of Existing Environment Baseline In Subsequent CEQA Challenge To Permanent Permits
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
CREED-21 v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2010 CEQA UPDATE
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Tomlinson v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
First District Holds CEQA Action Can Be Brought Directly Against Local Air District to Challenge “Authority to Construct” Issued for Mendocino County Asphalt Production Operation
1 Jun 2017, 3:57 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Friends of Outlet Creek v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
If A Tree Falls In The (Urban) Forest … Does CEQA Apply? Sixth District Holds City Of Santa Cruz’s Amendment Of Tree Protection Ordinance Not Categorically Exempt
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am by Arthur F. Coon
Such are the fundamental philosophical lessons of the Sixth District Court of Appeal’s recently published opinion in Save Our Big Trees v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2020 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Petitioners first became aware of the NOE on September 28, 2017, and requested Caltrans rescind the NOE or agree to a 180-day statute of limitations for challenging the decision. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2020 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Petitioners first became aware of the NOE on September 28, 2017, and requested Caltrans rescind the NOE or agree to a 180-day statute of limitations for challenging the decision. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Second District Reverses Preliminary Injunction, Holds CEQA Cannot Trump Santa Barbara County’s Authority To Remove Unpermitted Encroachments Placed In Public Right-Of-Way By Adjacent Landowners
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Christopher Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2020 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Petitioners first became aware of the NOE on September 28, 2017 and requested Caltrans rescind the NOE or agree to a 180-day statute of limitations for challenging the decision. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
"For meg er det et mysterium at regjeringen skal legge seg opp i dette på denne måten" [For me, it is a mystery that the government should get involved in this in this way], Unraveling the "Mystery" of the Norwegian Government's Block of Rules Limiting Lawyer Advice that Entails Human Rights Violations
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
  At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
Reversal of Misfortune: Second District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Los Angeles Housing Development Project Barred By Statute of Limitations, Reverses Trial Court Judgment Rejecting MND and Requiring EIR
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Delia Guerrero et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Two Foundations Of Our Freedom
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Oh noes our democracy is in peril! [read post]
Not a Potted Plant - http://notapottedplant.blogspot.com/
Second District Affirms Order Awarding CEQA Record Preparation Costs to Agency That Took Over Process After Unreasonable Delays, Notwithstanding Petitioner’s Election to Prepare Record
1 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  LandWatch San Luis Obispo County v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
RegBlog@5
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
RegBlog - http://www.regblog.org/
A Teaching Moment? First District Affirms CEQA Action Demurrer Order Finding Late-Joined Developers of UC Berkeley Campus Project Were Necessary, But Not Indispensable, Real Parties In Interest
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Tinsley v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com