Search for: "State v. Nordstrom"
Results 61 - 80
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
California Appellate Court Upholds Summary Judgment Where Expert Offers No Factual Basis for Opinion
7 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Bozzi v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:57 am
(Franco v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
’” Nordstrom, citing Cho v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:41 pm
But while the Nordstrom case is mostly concerned with how the consideration is structured and allocated, Munoz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:16 am
" Franco v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
Nordstrom, Inc., 90 USPQ2d 1758 (TTAB 2008). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Sponsored Topics: United States Attorney - Law - Los Angeles - United States - US Attorney [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:33 pm
See EEOC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Precedential No. 13: TTAB Axes Fender Guitar Shapes, Finding Them Generic or Lacking Acquired DistinctivenessOwnership:Pam Chestek Ponders the Transfer of Common Law Trademarks under State LawTTAB Affirms Rejection of SOU filed by Assignor After AssignmentTTAB Resolves Santana's Ownership Dispute, But Pamela Chestek is DissatisfiedTTAB Finds No Trademark Rights in OEM Who Applied "WASTEMAID" Mark at Others' DirectionPriority:Precedential No. 16: TTAB Throws New England… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:31 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:04 am
” Nordstrom, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:56 pm
In Glazer Capital Management, LP v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:56 pm
In Glazer Capital Management, LP v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:53 am
" After reviewing the case law concerning corporate securities liability, including its own prior decision in the Nordstrom v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To acquire or dispose of an asset, including real or personal property in this or another state, for cash or on credit, at public or private sale, and to manage, develop, improve, exchange, partition, change the character of, or abandon an estate asset; v. [read post]
