Search for: "State v. P. S."
Results 61 - 80
of 20,852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 5:00 am
Indeed, he had shortly before accepted some similar arguments in refusing an application for a declaration that a particular form of interim licence agreement would be FRAND in Lenovo v InterDigital ((2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)). [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:47 pm
S. 568, 572 (1942); see also Cantwell v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:00 am
P., Inc. v P.C.F., Inc. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
General remarks To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is an unprecedented decision not only in Bahrain, but in the MENA region in general. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stated differently, an accident is "a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed" (Matter of Kowal v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 1124, 1125 [2018]; Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, 678, 682, 684-685 [2018]). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stated differently, an accident is "a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed" (Matter of Kowal v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 1124, 1125 [2018]; Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, 678, 682, 684-685 [2018]). [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:07 pm
S. 438, 448 (2010); United States v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
But, Kagan concluded, “[p]erhaps most dispiriting is what lies behind the Court’s new approach — its special rules to specially disadvantage suits to remedy race-based redistricting. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:04 am
Enlarge / Ticketmaster advertisements in the United States v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 12:15 am
In Mahban v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
Appeals Bd., 495 P.2d 433 (Cal. 1972) (employee’s time was in “course of employment” when attending classes reimbursed by employer – in the context of a workers compensation claim). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
In addition, the statements in Wright’s verified answer denying the existence of an attorneyclient relationship with Cohen constitute formal judicial admissions (see P. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
Although the Court of Appeal stated in Ocado v AutoStore that the interest of the general public usually arises after a decision is rendered, the position was different in this case as it might be too late for Nicoventures to use the information in the EPO proceedings if access was not granted immediately. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
Anthropic PBC,[49] in which the defendants (the rights holders) were able to present clear examples of the reproduction of their lyrics by Claude, Anthropic’s AI tool.[50] Similarly, The New York Times was able to demonstrate in The New York Times Company v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
On 13 May 2024, the UPC Court of Appeal (CoA) upheld the Munich Local Division’s decision in SES v Hanshow (UPC_CoA_1/2024) that a preliminary injunction should be refused on the basis that there was not sufficient certainty that certain models of Hanshow’s electronic label products infringe SES’ patent. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Strikingly, Judge Pérez’s concurrence in Frutarom recognized that the court unnecessarily created new law, engaging in undue judicial policymaking. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:54 pm
The history is found at Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
” Objections relating to Palestinian statehood: As two of a small group of States contesting Palestinian statehood, Israel and the United States have objected to Palestine’s capacity to accede to the ICC Statute. [read post]
