Search for: "State v. Perez (MODIFIED)"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Perez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am
Is the concurrent duties regulation for executive employees (allowing the performance of both exempt and nonexempt duties concurrently) working appropriately or does it need to be modified to avoid sweeping nonexempt employees into the exemption? [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
In addition, the Social Services Law was amended to comply with the federal requirement to increase from $500 to $550 the amount of support that the State must collect and disburse to the family prior to imposing the fee for each federal fiscal year. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
First, such an exception is at odds with the policy reasons why 48 states (and DC and Puerto Rico) follow the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
” Santizo-Perez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Perez v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
In the Fourth Department case, Perez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
Perez, 391 N.J. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
Perez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:29 pm
While rule 27.3 contemplates the trial court's ability to modify or amend orders that have been appealed, neither the December 12, 2012 Order nor the May 1, 2013 Order modified or amended the trial court's November 12, 2012 Order. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:29 pm
While rule 27.3 contemplates the trial court's ability to modify or amend orders that have been appealed, neither the December 12, 2012 Order nor the May 1, 2013 Order modified or amended the trial court's November 12, 2012 Order. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:55 pm
R.B., Appellant, v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:21 pm
LISONEL PEREZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:06 pm
In the 2008 case of Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 449 (Tex. 2011). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
Illinois Jury Verdict for Saw Manufacturer in Product Defect Case Appellate Court Publishes Opinion Regarding the Use of Tools to Modify Product Causing Injury – Perez v. [read post]
