Search for: "State v. Personnel Housing"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
Housing Auth. v Dugan, 261 AD2d 406Typically when a position is abolished and this results in the layoff of a permanent employee, his or her name is placed on a preferred list in accordance with the provisions of Civil Service Law Section 80 [permanent employees in the competitive class] or Section 80-a [permanent employees in the noncompetitive class]. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 3:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:07 am
There was a sold-out crowd of 80 attendees from cities, counties, PUDs, PDFs, Schools, Ports, Housing Authorities, Parks and even two state agencies. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:07 am
There was a sold-out crowd of 80 attendees from cities, counties, PUDs, PDFs, Schools, Ports, Housing Authorities, Parks and even two state agencies. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:07 am
The Estate Of Marc Palotay et al v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:45 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
Personnel from the Cabarrus County probation office participated in the initiative. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 11:21 am
The case of Madziva v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 8:34 am
Morgan and PhoneDog v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Estate of Michael Heiser v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:14 am
Having adequate personnel to process permits and address other regulatory issues that impact economic development are critical to that effort. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
United States Office of Personnel Management (No. 10-00257). [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The second, through adoption by each house of Congress on a two-thirds vote and ratification by three-fourths of the states, is the only one that has had success. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
In a 4-3 decision, in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:21 pm
However, the use of this machine was kept under the radar until this past December when the Tenth Circuit in United States v. [read post]