Search for: "State v. Petersen"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:32 am
” – Maryland Court of Appeals citing Divorce and Separation, by Nelson, in Fleegle v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am
Stewart and Kyle Petersen On January 10, 2013, U.S. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am
” Petersen v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The 1709 Blog carries the results of the black-crested macaque selfie sidebar poll, which turned out to less exciting than some of us had hoped, on account of so many people agreeing that no copyright existed at all in works created by animals [this Kat wonders whether this might be another nail in the much-cited dictum of Petersen J in University of London Press Limited v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch. 601 that "what is worth copying is prima facie… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Petersen Publ'g Co. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
However, in another German case before the ECJ, Petersen v Berufungsausschuss fuer Zahnaertze fuer den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe it was not justifiable for a maximum age of 68 to be imposed on doctors and dentists practising in the state medical system where it was alleged that the rule was necessary to protect patients from a decline in performance as doctors and dentists got older: no such age limit existed in the private sector. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:52 am
(Burlesci v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:04 am
In his majority opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
Petersen v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
See Boschma v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm
The current “uniform” state acts came int [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:37 am
Gomes v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
Stapleton of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am
In so doing, we overrule the contrary holdings of State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:52 am
(Burlesci v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Petersen v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:36 am
That’s the tough lesson that an LLC member facing termination of his membership status learned in Costello v Molloy et al., 73 Misc 3d 1206(A) [Sup Ct 2021]. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:42 pm
See Mabry v. [read post]
