Search for: "State v. Phams" Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
Alexander In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Timothy Saviola, Nathan Swire
The Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade, which currently has 2,100 members, will eventually boast 17 V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircrafts and 52 amphibious assault vehicles; it is charged with taking or retaking contested islands in the event of an invasion. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Welder is laid off at the start of COVID-19 pandemic In the case of Pham v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Welder is laid off at the start of COVID-19 pandemic In the case of Pham v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]