Search for: "State v. Planck"
Results 61 - 80
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2016, 5:43 am
Referring to the CJEU's State of Bavaria v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
Kamina, V. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
And those submissions present a distorted picture, for the reasons stated above.In this post I'll focus only on the proportionality of injunctions, not on other aspects of the reform bill that the submissions touch on, except where there is an inevitable overlap.Submissions in favor of major improvement over the status quo (i.e., fewer injunctions)Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition: That one is fantastic. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Lukasz first reviewed the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost, on the extent to which injunctive relief, granted in the court of one EU Member States, should or must extend to the entire extent of the EU? [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:08 am
Recalling the ruling given by the International Court of Justice itself in 2012, in the case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
This report has been prepared by Priyanka Jain, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Luxembourg. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Here is what they have to say below: Sisvel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm
Development and implementation of an accompanying communication strategy; V. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:10 pm
It's Case C-94/07, Raccanelli v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften eV, a reference to the European Court of Justice from the Arbeitsgericht Bonn (Germany) for a preliminary ruling.Right: Max Planck -- the face that launched a thousand institutesThis reference related to Article 7 of Council Regulation 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, which says:"1. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am
Earlier today, a number of international and foreign associations and copyright scholars filed an Amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in the ABC, Inc. et al v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am
Emoji were also in the limelight in a case before the State Labor Court of Baden-Württemberg. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
, Irene BloemraadPart V Membership in the State and Beyond 25. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:48 pm
One of the questions that was asked about the Panama Papers leak was why there was relatively little impact in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
GermanyUser v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:59 am
Introduction by: Joseph Straus (Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition) Presentations by the authors: Simon Klopschinski (rospatt osten pross) Christopher S. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
The epicentre of intellectual property in Europe is reckoned by many to be somewhere between Brussels (where policy is made), Luxembourg (where the Court of Justice interprets IP laws and achieves considerable harmonisation by stealth) and Munich (seat of the European and German Patent Offices, plus GRUR and the ever-brimming brains who inhabit the think-tank of the Max Planck Institute). [read post]
