Search for: "State v. Potter Company" Results 61 - 80 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2022, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
 [2016] EWHC 188 (Pat)  is about the most recent practice direction which aligns the UK regime with the fast-approaching UPC's stated intention that all cases will be done and dusted within a year. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am by Matrix Law
.: On Monday 6th and Tuesday 7th March 2023 the Court will hear The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd No 2, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 852. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 22nd November 2022 R (on the application of Maguire) v His Majesty’s Senior Coroner… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
At the Washington Post, Tara Bahrampour reports on an estate sale at the home of the late Justice Potter Stewart. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 10th May the Court will hand-down judgment in Jalla and another v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company and another [2023] UKSC 16. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am by Matrix Law
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 22nd November 2022 R (on the application of Maguire) v His Majesty’s… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
Stated another way, the two transactions have different implications. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:44 am
Cowen & Company - delivered an opinion regarding a lawsuit filed in California state court by 63 shareholders against an investment banking firm. [read post]