Search for: "State v. Prosser" Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2011, 9:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
I quickly found a case stating the relevant rule of law—every contract needs consideration, or something. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm by Unknown
Heiserman, 898 P.2d 1049, 1055 (Colo. 1995) (quoting Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 46, at 324 (5th ed. 1984)) [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, punitive damages may be awarded where the [*6]wrong complained of is "actuated by evil and reprehensible motives" (Walker, 10 NY2d at 404), is "intentional and deliberate, and has the character of outrage frequently associated with crime" (Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466, 479 [1993], quoting Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 2, at 9 [5th ed 1984] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
If you can figure out the syntax of this post's headline, you've just figured out the rationale of the Wisconsin Supreme Court in E-L Enterprises, Inc v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Deere & Co., 769 N.W.2d 536 (Wis. 2009) (Gableman, Prosser & Rogensack, JJ. concurring); Godoy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
United States, 848 F.2d 362, 364 [2d Cir1988] ). [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
So while in 2012 ‘intrusion upon seclusion’ may have found favour with Whata J, this could be the fullest extent to which New Zealand courts adopt the United States’ Restatements torts (sourced from Harvard Law Professor William Prosser’s seminal 1960 article). [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Page Keeton, Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts § 53 (5th ed. 1984)]. [read post]