Search for: "State v. Rees"
Results 61 - 80
of 564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
Rolls Royce, PLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The group was established at the Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor Law School by 1989 ASU Law alum and Gordon & Rees co-managing partner, Leon Silver, and 2007 ASU grad Rebecca Lumley. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:43 pm
This court does not address, because the State did not raise, the appropriateness of our considering this appeal by counsel who were appointed for petitioner by the district court against his will, and who have filed this appeal despite his wishes and despite the court's resolution of the Rees v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
Rees is applicable when states are using a different execution protocol than the one involved in Baze v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:31 am
They also hark back to Baze v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Rees. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:03 am
Until Baze v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm
The story of Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm
Justice Ginsburg is up next with Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:06 am
This morning's decision sides 5:4 with the state, finding that... [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:09 am
See Baze v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Francis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
On June 4, 2015, the court decided Schaecher v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
On June 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:18 am
Rees is applicable when states are using a different execution protocol than the one involved in Baze v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 9:03 pm
Rees. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:28 pm
Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008) (sodium thiopental); Pavatt v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:23 pm
That case is OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:01 pm
Rees allowing use of lethal-drug executions, and the proof that a death-row inmate must offer to show that a lethal-injection protocol would violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
