Search for: "State v. Robart"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2015, 12:13 am
Motorola v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:27 pm
The royalty base.Even Judge Robart held in the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
” Judge Gallo found that the Defendant “failed to preserve multiple documents that are relevant to Plaintiff’s claims with the requisite culpable state of mind to support a finding of spoliation of evidence”. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:01 am
In this post here I'd like to share with you the opening brief that Google's Motorola Mobility filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit earlier this week in the Microsoft v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:59 pm
The full case can be found at Coronel v. [read post]
Google makes itself ridiculous, tells appeals court something Microsoft can disprove with transcript
12 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
Today I've become aware of another ridiculously untrue assertion that is almost as bad as what happened in that Apple v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:16 pm
The Supreme Court opinion in Christianson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified a partial final judgment (this post continues below the document): 13-11-12 Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:24 am
Compared to the FRAND rate-setting opinions by Judges Robart and Holderman, last week's Wi-LAN v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm
Robart in Seattle (Western District of Washington) pioneered this field with his 207-page rate-setting opinion in Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Yesterday I attended a Samsung v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
At least in Germany, the largest European market, there is no eBay v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
Judge Robart in the Western District of Washington found Motorola entitled, also in a Microsoft case, to less than one-twentieth of a percent of the royalty rate it demanded. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
A month ago I reported on a Microsoft letter to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, asking Judge James Robart for permission to bring a motion to "renew and expand" an anti-suit injunction so as to bar Google's Motorola Mobility from suing Microsoft in Mannheim, Germany, for royalties on patents declared essential to the H.264 video codec standard. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit scheduled the "Posner appeal" (Apple v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm
A week before the Federal Circuit's appellate hearing on Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:14 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 10:33 am
Tomorrow (Monday, August 26, 2013) the Microsoft v. [read post]
Google may have to pick up Microsoft's attorneys' fees necessitated by injunction requests over SEPs
12 Aug 2013, 10:19 am
In two weeks from today, the Microsoft v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:09 am
Robart seemed skeptical of this, "Do you have authority for that? [read post]
