Search for: "State v. Robert Price"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Panelists: Robert E. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:00 pm
This year the Roberts Supreme Court is continuing its renewed focus on antitrust law. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:58 am
The 5-4 majority held that the district court and Ninth Circuit both erred in concluding that the price-squeezees stated a viable antitrust claim. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Batiste v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:32 am
Facts: This case (Branson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Alleyne v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
The Court’s Rejection of the Physical Presence Rule in Quill Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court; writing for a majority that included Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, and Gorsuch.[8] Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:25 am
Chief Justice Roberts recognized that the states did not actually have a meaningful choice of whether to expand Medicaid. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:42 am
Schumer called out Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, stating “You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
Related posts:SCOTUS Review: Roberts Court Pro-Corporate Perception Persists SCOTUS Clarifies Issues, Leaves Others Unsettled AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:16 am
The genesis of my writing this blog today was a Supreme Court case (released on June 23, 2022) entitled Robert Sipko v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
Justice Roberts cited the Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
Justice Roberts cited the Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:42 am
The Court reversed a lower court decision and found that a family of California raisin growers deserved just compensation after the state impounded parts of their crops in a price-support program. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:55 am
State Farm), that means prices will rise to cover risks like the Broussards. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm
King also means that, in many respects, the PPACA is now the law that Chief Justice Roberts wrote as here, as in NFIB v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
See United States v. [read post]
