Search for: "State v. Robert Price"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
(The 1970s-era standing decision in question is United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
In May 1962, Secretary of Defense, Robert S. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
” (See, e.g., The Cost of Accidents p. 55) This may explain why Hale wrote about public utility regulation—a system under which the state sets the prices for certain industries—whereas Guido has for the most part written about private law. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
Price v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:25 am
Chief Justice Roberts recognized that the states did not actually have a meaningful choice of whether to expand Medicaid. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Justice has a price, and there is a point at which that price is not worth paying. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:56 am
Taylor v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
” “If democracy is justified in governing the state, then it must also be justified in governing economic enterprises; and to say that it is not justified in governing economic enterprises is to imply that it is not justified in governing the state,” writes the eminent political scientist Robert Dahl. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:03 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts's opinion for the Court holds that "state law is one important source [of property rights]. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that the participating States in the UPC and UPCA agreement are not the same and that, in the case of the UPCA, they are not all EU Member States. [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:19 am
” Perhaps this vagueness was the price Chief Justice Roberts had to pay to generate a rare unanimous Takings Clause ruling. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
" Perhaps this vagueness was the price Chief Justice Roberts had to pay to generate a rare unanimous Takings Clause ruling. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
(The defense team included lawyers from Jaburg & Wilk, Wilenchik & Bartness, and the Law Office of Robert W Shely). [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am
For example, some lower-priced technologies collect more data than other technologies, such as inexpensive smartphones that come with preinstalled apps that leak data and can’t be deleted. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:20 am
As CJ Roberts wrote for the Court last Term in West Virginia v. [read post]
