Search for: "State v. Roller" Results 61 - 80 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2013, 6:04 am by Kit Case
; In a win for injured workers, a recent Court of Appeals case (Sohn Manufacturing v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:04 am by Kit Case
; In a win for injured workers, a recent Court of Appeals case (Sohn Manufacturing v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
The defendant in State v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:52 am
In the UK, where the shirt was a sales success, Rihanna will have to bring her claim within the scope of a passing-off action, as did Eddie Irvine in Irvine v Talksport Ltd -- an action in which a motor racing driver whose image was wrongly used so as to imply endorsement of the defendant's radio service, famously stated that he "wouldn't get out of bed" for less than £25,000. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:09 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Arbitration: California truck drivers compelled to arbitrate wage claims, December 29, 2015, HR.BLOR.com More Blog Entries: Allen v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Steve Baird
On Februrary 3, Adidas, following-through on its promise to take appropriate action barring a satisfactory response, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Riedell, here, in Portland federal district court ("home court" for German-based Adidas in the United States). [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm by Mike Aylward
A few weeks later, the Fifth Circuit ruled in Comer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:27 pm by Larry
" The latter including goods of Heading 8429, meaning "Self-propelled bulldozers, angledozers, graders, levelers, scrapers, mechanical shovels, excavators, shovel loaders, tamping machines and road rollers," which is really the topic of this post.In Norca Engineered Products, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm by ireneolszewski
Stay tuned for more twists and turns on this roller coaster ride we call equality. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
In Widewaters Herkimer Co., LLC v Aiello, 28 A.D.3d 1107, 817 N.Y.S.2d 790 (4th Dept. 2006), without mentioning its decision seven years earlier in Matter of Roller (discussed above), the Fourth Department seemingly turned its back on Roller by rejecting allegations of oppression by the majority members — the statutorily authorized basis for seeking dissolution under BCL Section 1104-a– as ground for judicial dissolution under Section 702. [read post]