Search for: "State v. Russell Council Judge"
Results 61 - 80
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Natural Resources Defense Council commands that a reviewing judge defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute the agency administers if (1) the statutory provision at issue is ambiguous and (2) the agency’s interpretation is reasonable. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The Council stated that the 60-day trial was intended to “keep residents safe” and will not be implemented without further consultation. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Jay J granted summary judgment to the claimants, Russell Brand and Jemima Goldsmith. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:32 am
Pereira v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represent the petitioner.Title: Allshouse v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Supplemental brief for petitioners Second supplemental brief for petitioners Amicus brief of the United States Case(s) involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 09-102 Title: Virginia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, the high-profile union-fees case, and Dahda v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
The story was judged to be inaccurate by IPSO, and a further correction has been requested. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
On the same day there was an application in the case of Todary v W1 Cars Ltd before the same judge. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court held that an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, doesn’t have to “’cripple’” certain unions across the country. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Whether The Duchy of Lancaster is a “public authority” for the purposes of the 2004 regs: Staffordshire County Council v IC EA/2010/0015. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 12:23 am
In the absence of any fuller explanation, who would judge what has “merit” remains to be seen: call us naïve, but we thought that that was what judges were for. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Brief amici curiae of American Benefits Council, et al. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
The Eleventh Circuit abided the stripping (as some judges are wont to do). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
