Search for: "State v. S&ers"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 2:56 am
But time ran out before we could recite the last part of the bard's recreation of how Henry V rallied his weary warriors on the eve of the decisive engagement. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:37 pm
Energy Nw. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
The statute is anything but clear, especially when viewed in the light of the Supreme Court's decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:39 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 11:50 pm
United States: Download Luke Milligan's Federalist Society podcast . [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:19 pm
SEARCH &;amp; SEIZUREUnited States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:29 pm
Yesterday in No. 07-330, Greenlaw v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:28 am
Rivkin, who is a Partner at Baker & Hostetler LLP. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 859, 120 S. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Fox & Associates (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 333 (discussed here), Decambre v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Long ago, the United States Supreme Court concluded that the “seas” referenced in one statute required no water at all (Murray’s Lessee v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
In the case of Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd & ANOR v Argo Systems FZE [2011] EWCA Civ 1572 it was held that the judge at first instance had erred in concluding that Liberty (the appellant insurer) had made an unequivocal representation to Argo (the insured) that it no longer intended to rely on its legal right to be discharged from liability under a policy of marine insurance as a result of Argo's breach of a warranty.Liberty had written a letter in 2003… [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:38 am
As we stated in Kelly [Kelly v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
The majority opinion concluded, "Because the district court erred in holding that the "discretionary function" exception barred the Navy's liability on and the court's subject matter jurisdiction over Myers's claim, and clearly erred in finding that the Navy acted "reasonably" and not in breach of its duty in conducting the remediation of contaminated soil in the project at issue… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
The first, State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:49 am
Ameribuilt Contractors appealed the workers' compensation judge's February 1, 2022 order rejecting a proposed settlement and disqualifying its assigned insurance counsel, Brown & Connery, LLP (B&C), on the basis of a perceived conflict between Ameribuilt's workers' compensation carrier, Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Co. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
In reviving the state-law sex discrimination claim of a Carabin & Shaw (C&S) legal assistant who was fired while on maternity leave, the Fifth Circuit in an unpublished opinion found that a magistrate judge and district court erred in rejecting her deposition statements as self-serving while accepting those of the law firm’s employees. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:15 am
Counter-restitution not required Halpern and Another v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
& Dev., 84 NY2d 129, 134 [1994], quoting Post v Burger & Gohlke, 216 NY 544, 553 [1916]). [read post]
