Search for: "State v. S. A. N."
Results 61 - 80
of 20,375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am
As Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal explained in King v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
The third focuses cognitive control of target populations of competitor or target states (and other collectives) connected to "cold war. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 am
Music producer Sherman Nealy initiated what would become Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"[A]n arbitrator 'exceed[s] [their] power' under the meaning of the statute where [their] 'award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power' " (id.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"[A]n arbitrator 'exceed[s] [their] power' under the meaning of the statute where [their] 'award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power' " (id.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127… [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
The Court rejected the Second Circuit’s approach in Sohm v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:14 am
Ball State University, where a student sued alleging a professor’s advances created a hostile learning environment, and Doe v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
NYSUT’s local affiliates represent library media specialists, who staff school libraries throughout New York State. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
NYSUT’s local affiliates represent library media specialists, who staff school libraries throughout New York State. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:24 pm
Idaho State Tax Comm’n, the Idaho Supreme Court crafted a unique approach to agency deference in a case involving conflicting tax statutes. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
Zircon Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Ezekiel Dixon-RomÁn and Dr. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Ezekiel Dixon-RomÁn and Dr. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]