Search for: "State v. S. R. J." Results 61 - 80 of 9,180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Morris, 2018 ONSC 5186 “Mr. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
The case of R (Interim Board of X) v Ofsted ([2016] EWHC 2004 (Admin)) provides a useful guide for public authorities and claimants who may be involved in public law injunctions. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am by CLARE MONTGOMERY QC
On 8 November 2017, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of John Haralambous (“JH”) in the case of R (Haralambous) v Crown Court at St Albans. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:52 am by sally
Supreme Court FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 22 (25 May 2011) SK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 23 (25 May 2011) Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24 (25 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Spencer, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1231 (20 April 2011) Thomas, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1295 (25 May 2011) Court of Appeal… [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:16 pm
Wyeth, Inc., 850 N.W.2d at p. 376 (plur. opn. of Waterman, J.) [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:30 am by John Lewis
The appellate court held that J & G’s waiver of the right to arbitrate Collado’s FLSA claim did “not extend to the state law claims that were pleaded for the first time after J & G had litigated to the point of waiver of the FLSA claims. [read post]